Thursday, May 7, 2020

A "NEW NORMAL" WILL NEVER BE NORMAL

After reading this editorial, please express your own thoughts.  At the bottom, please click on the word "Comments" below the copyright and type your remarks in the box.  When finished,  please click on the word "Publish."  Please also share a link to this column with others in your e-mail directory and on social media.

This copyrighted column - in part or in its entirety - may be freely shared among individuals, and it may be reprinted, republished, or quoted in any medium, including broadcast, cable, satellite, print, Internet, and other forms of media, but only when crediting Gary B. Duglin and The Controversy.     

     It's time for me to be blunt and to spell it out in plain, easy English.  If you're demonstrating in protest of your state's stay-at-home and social distancing orders because of the coronavirus/COVID-19 pandemic, then you're a fool.
    
     Each and every governor of our 50 states should have made a blanket pact to keep our country closed for an extended period of time until the coronavirus curve flattened across the board for at least 22 days.  Data from China, which was published in The Lancet medical journal, indicates that for people who died from COVID-19, the average time between the onset of symptoms and their demise was 18.5 days, with a range of 15 to 22 days.  Wuhan, China is where the COVID-19 outbreak began.  According to a report by the World Health Organization, WHO officials first learned of China's coronavirus cases on December 31st, 2019. Reporting by The Washington Post and The Wall Street Journal found that the first person diagnosed with the COVID-19 disease was a Chinese patient in Wuhan on December 10th.  Donald Trump and Congress should have fully supported a plan - as I described above - in a unanimous, albeit unofficial response since the U.S. Constitution says the federal government cannot overrule a decision of any state in a health crisis. Instead, some states are now open, while others are not. 
    
     In an effort to protect them, certain governors are doing their jobs by keeping the people of their state safe and, therefore, the state remains closed.  If you're calling your governor every vicious name under the sun then you obviously don't care about your own health or the health of others, especially those who are your friends, co-workers, or members of your own families. Meanwhile, White House Coronavirus Response Coordinator, Dr. Deborah Birx - on Monday, May 4th, 2020, called it "devastatingly worrisome" that anti-lockdown protesters are not practicing social distancing.  Dr. Birx is anxious that protesters will "go home and infect their grandmother(s) or their grandfather(s)" and if they die, those rebels "will feel guilty for the rest of (their) lives."

     Dr. Birx is correct.  As people start interacting more, it will cause more sickness and it will result in more COVID-19 deaths.  But without a state lockdown, a state or local emergency curfew, or a declaration of martial law, the U.S. Constitution gives Americans the freedom to come and go as they please, and across state lines.  With outdoor temperatures already reaching 80 degrees or higher in many parts of our nation, people will be traveling to places where beaches and tourist attractions are open.  Returning home to the states where they live - some of which may not yet be permitting any form of social gatherings - will cause individuals to infect others, and the coronavirus pandemic will go on and on and on throughout the remainder of the spring season and throughout the summer.  Come autumn - should a second wave of COVID-19 become a reality, as many doctors believe - the health of every one of us could be in jeopardy, and America as we knew it a few months ago will be a thing of the past.

     Donald Trump's spotlight should be shining on a way to test every single American for the coronavirus.  To date, only about 6-million Americans have been tested, and with an estimated U.S. population of about 330-million people, that's only about 2 percent of our nation.  A report from Harvard University suggests that by the middle of this summer the U.S. should test 20-million people everyday.  The Harvard study says that's the only way to completely "remobilize the economy." Currently, only about 200,000 Americans are tested daily.  So when Trump says - as he often does - that the United States has the greatest testing and the most testing, it's simply not true. On April 28th, Trump was adamant that "We are way ahead on testing.  We are the best in the world on testing.  We've tested much more than anybody else, times two - of every country combined.  We've tested more than every country combined." But The Washington Post fact-checked with the COVID Tracking Project and based on "the number of tests per million people," the U.S. ranks lower in testing than the United Arab Emirates, Spain, Italy, Germany and Russia.  So, as usual, Trump lies through his teeth.  But even when it's proven he's lied, Trump will do it again and again and again.   

     Before we can be certain that the coronavirus is unable to spread throughout our country, a strategy for testing, contact tracing, isolation and quarantine is the only logical path to take. People will need to be regularly tested, over the aforementioned 22-day time frame, to be sure that someone who is negative today doesn't show up positive tomorrow.  But on Wednesday, May 6th, White House Press Secretary Kayleigh McEnany told reporters at a press briefing that "The notion that everyone needs to be tested is simply nonsensical."  McEnany explained that COVID-19 tests would have to be given over and over again.  Duh!  That's right.  And in addition to tests, hospitals and makeshift medical facilities across America must be properly equipped with surgical masks, gloves and other Personal Protective Equipment so that physicians, nurses and other healthcare and emergency professionals - America's heroic frontline responders - are protected when they help us.
    
     Doctors, scientists and others who are experts in the field of infectious diseases are recommending that our entire country remains closed while there is no proven COVID-19 cure and no vaccine to prevent people from being infected by the coronavirus. But in a Fox News virtual town hall on Sunday, May 3rd, Donald Trump pledged that a vaccine will be available this year - by the end of 2020 - which contradicts the educated opinions of science and medical gurus in the Trump administration, including Dr. Anthony Fauci, the Director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, who is arguably our nation's top expert in the field of infectious diseases.  Dr. Fauci, on March 3rd, predicted, "It will take at least a year to a year-and-a-half to have a vaccine we can use."  But on April 30th, Dr. Fauci became more optimistic as he now believes a coronavirus vaccine could become widely available by January 2021 if "things fall in to place."  

     The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention plus other health officials are urging Americans to stay home and to only go outside when practicing social distancing and while wearing masks.  But Donald Trump has pushed to reopen our nation's economy and he has convinced many governors - most of them Republicans and some of them Democrats - to, at least, allow certain non-essential businesses to open their doors.  As this column is published there are already 23 states that have partially reopened their economies.  More will open between now and next week, and by Sunday, May 10th at least 43 states are expected to fully or partially reopen.  It's mind-boggling to me that any amount of Americans would gamble with their lives when we have an international disease killing thousands of people everyday.  That said, a new poll from The Washington Post and the University of Maryland indicates that the majority of Americans are leery about returning to a normal routine just yet.  Americans fear being infected by the coronavirus, and the poll shows they're against putting a stop to restrictions that doctors and scientists believe will slow the spread of the disease.  A whopping 82 percent of Americans say movie theaters should remain closed, while 78 percent are opposed to re-opening gyms and fitness centers, and 74 percent of people in the United States feel that dine-in restaurants and nail salons should not unlock the doors for patrons.

     So that my readers don't accuse me of being completely partisan, the governors who have given the green light - whether they be Republican or Democrat - are greedy and irrational.  The consensus of opinion by highly trained and educated medical professionals nationwide is that permitting businesses to re-open - even partially - will spread the coronavirus like melting butter on a stack of hot pancakes. I would have thought that our nation's governors - no matter their political party - would be more focused on saving lives than saving money.  But I suppose Donald Trump's irritability is as contagious as the coronavirus itself.  Trump is impatient because of COVID-19's detrimental impact on the state of our economy.  Trump was counting on - what he believed was - "the greatest economy that we've had in our history, the best" to help him get re-elected on November 3rd.  Just because the stock market - specifically the Dow Jones Industrial Average - hit a record high of 29,551.42 on February 12th, 2020, doesn't equate to being the best economy ever. But Trump paints a portrait of false claims that is nothing more than his hyperbole run amok.  Trump lies and those bold falsehoods saturate social media chat rooms, which tend to be filled with his base of brainwashed believers.  
    
     Numerous economic scholars have proven in many different ways that the economy of the late 1990s, under President Bill Clinton, was significantly more successful than at any time under Donald Trump.  One of those economists is Dr. Martin Baily of the Brookings Institution. He is a former Chairman of the Council of Economic Advisers.  Full disclosure, Dr. Baily is a Democrat who served under President Clinton.  But he 

studied at the prestigious Cambridge University in the 
United Kingdom and it is there that he earned his undergraduate degree.  Dr. Baily also holds a Ph.D. in economics from the distinguished Massachusetts Institute of Technology.  He also taught at MIT and at the renowned Yale University.  Politics aside - with these credentials - the guy knows what he's talking about.  Dr. Baily told Business Insider that under President Clinton, "Growth was faster, productivity growth was much faster.  There was similarly low inflation, and there was a broader improvement in living standards at the time."  As for Trump's claim that because of him, America's economy (pre-pandemic) was the best, his narcissism and egomania would never allow himself to praise anyone but himself, and


certainly never anyone by the name of Clinton. But there's no debating that President Clinton deserves credit for a decade of prosperity throughout his two terms sitting behind The Oval Office desk. Our 42nd President's bed of roses blossoms with even more economic accomplishments. When he left office on January 20th, 2001, unemployment was at 4 percent, and Mr. Clinton was responsible for a historic rate of job creation.  To top it off, when he moved out of The White House, President Clinton provided President George W. Bush and our country with a budget surplus; a feat that, to date, has not been repeated.

     Our country is in chaos.  The U.S. Department of Labor reported on Thursday, May 7th that more than 33-million Americans have lost their jobs.  But Donald Trump hasn't got an ounce of compassion or empathy in his bones, so don't ever expect him to be warm and fuzzy with people who are hungry or cannot pay the rent, as we suffer the worst economy in decades.  The J.P. Morgan company expects the U.S.


gross domestic product to take a sharp dive in the second quarter of 2020.  They're forecasting that the GDP will shrink a shocking 40 percent, and the unemployment rate will soar to 20 percent, which will come close to The Great Depression of the 1930s.  But Donald Trump loyalists - who are recklessly 
determined to keep the "incompetent-in-chief" on his pedestal of perversion - continue to worship the deceitful Trump when he is leading them in to mental

error and distorted judgment. With some sort of mysterious power, Trump has influenced his base for nearly five years since he became a Republican presidential candidate, and he has misguided them and corrupted their thinking throughout his presidency. Trump's dishonest behavior and his lack of integrity have polluted the minds of Americans who - prior to him - were still politically opposite of my views, but at least they were not accepting to be escorted down a pathway to death.  The two Republican nominees for President before Donald Trump - the now late U.S. Senator John McCain of Arizona in 2008, and the then former governor of Massachusetts and now U.S. Senator Mitt Romney of Utah in 2012 - were, and are, honorable gentlemen whose concern was always for the betterment of the people and the safety and security of the United States.  But Trump's concentration is only on his own self-interest, his own bank account, and whatever he has to do to get re-elected for a second term; even if it means lying to Americans or trying to publicly smear his opponent with blatant untruths so that voters might be swayed to not cast their ballots for his Democratic Party challenger.  After all, Trump cares about nobody but himself.  His negligence and his apathetic response to the outbreak of the coronavirus months ago have caused people to die who should be alive today.
    
     As a lifelong ultra-progressive liberal Democrat who supports Joe Biden for President, I applaud The Lincoln Project, a group of prominent conservative "Never Trump" Republicans. The following words are part of an ad that was released on Monday, May 4th, which was produced and paid for by The Lincoln Project. "There's mourning in America.  And under the leadership of Donald Trump, our country's weaker, and sicker, and poorer.  And now, Americans are asking, 'If we have another four years like this, will there even be an America?'"  Our country is better than this.  Our country is better than having Donald Trump in The White House.  Americans need to not even think about who they should vote for on November 3rd.  It's a no-brainer.  Americans need to elect Joe Biden on that Tuesday this fall so that on January 20th, 2021 the former Vice President Biden will take the oath of office as the 46th President of the United States. 
    
     Back to the pandemic, Trump on March 22nd tweeted - and in uppercase letters - "WE CANNOT LET THE CURE BE WORSE THAN THE PROBLEM ITSELF."  The problem, though, is not only the coronavirus, but that the man in charge is leadership deficient.  Trump insists on ignoring health authorities who are practically pleading with people to stay away from others, and that it may be weeks, perhaps months, before we should hang out together.  But Trump voters are so ironclad with their zeal for him that their adoration and allegiance for Trump is tantamount to cult-like.  Should Trump request them to do so, many "Trumpers" very well might follow their leader off a 10,000-foot cliff while drinking Kool-Aid laced with cyanide.  Trump, of course, would make sure his beverage was only spiked with vodka from a gift bottle given to him by his Russian pal, President Vladimir Putin, and hidden under Trump's coat would be a specially made parachute that could not be seen by his self-proclaimed disciples.  After all, he'll get his devotees to go off the edge, but Trump would never sacrifice himself for any cause.

     To help reduce the spread of the coronavirus, about 95 percent of Americans were under state-ordered lockdowns in April.  But as the clock struck midnight from last Thursday, April 30th in to Friday, May 1st, Donald Trump's social distancing guidelines expired.  The premature decision by Trump and those governors who support his warped thinking have given Americans the go-ahead to be irresponsible, despite an ongoing lethal pandemic.  As to the specifics of their re-openings, Trump and his West Wing accomplices have shrugged their shoulders and have thrown those governors to the wolves, and it doesn't matter to Trump who gets hurt along the way by restarting the economy.  He has come to the conclusion that for life to move forward for most Americans, some more have to die.  "Hopefully that won't be the case, but it could very well be the case," Trump told reporters on Wednesday, May 6th when he was asked if the nation should just accept the idea that by re-opening the country there will be more deaths from the coronavirus.  Trump added, "We can't keep our country closed down for years.  We have to get our country open again."  All Trump cares about is getting people back to work so our nation's economy can grow, which he thinks will help him get re-elected.  But if a person is dead, they can't spend any money.  By the way, nobody has even hinted to keeping America closed for years. 
   
     "Uncle Sam" says "I Want You" to cover your faces, but some states say it's okay to go bowling and to the movies, to get a tattoo or a massage, to get a haircut or a manicure, to eat in restaurants, to go to the beaches, to gyms, to fitness centers, to summer camps, and to socialize in groups of less than ten people - as if it would take eleven people or more to give someone the coronavirus.  All it takes is one person to infect another.  Other activities are being condoned, as well as more forms of business, including at least one state - Florida - which has approved the re-opening of shopping malls.  The Trump administration, at present, does, however, still endorse the wearing of masks in public; although we've not yet seen Trump himself wearing one.   
   
     The worldwide coronavirus crisis is far from over.  But we must never forget that Donald Trump ignored this deadly disease after he was warned by no fewer than two Cabinet-level advisers. Allow me to refresh your memories.  On January 29th, Trump was undoubtedly informed by the first of two troubling memos that were reportedly distributed among White House officials and written by the Director of the National Trade Council Peter Navarro, 
who in that initial correspondence wrote to the National Security Council that a pandemic could kill more than one-half-million Americans and cost the United States close to 6-trillion dollars.  Navarro cautioned that "The risk of a worst-case pandemic scenario should not be overlooked."  In his second disturbing memo - which was directed to Trump himself on February 23rd - Navarro's words were even more alarming as he alerted Trump that up to two-million Americans could succumb to the


disease.  "There is an increasing probability of a full-blown COVID-19 pandemic that could infect as many as 100-million Americans, with a loss of life of as many as one-to-two-million souls."  But Trump did nothing, and five days later is when he labeled the coronavirus a "hoax" that was created by the Democrats.  The day after Navarro's first memo, Secretary of Health and Human Services Alex Azar on January 30th reportedly urged Trump in a telephone conversation to be concerned of a possible pandemic.  The New York Times says Trump's attitude was that "Azar was being an alarmist." 

     As a two-time cancer survivor, my mantra has always been that "tomorrow will be better."  Therefore, it's sad and painful for this writer - a person who is generally so very optimistic about life - to envision such long-range doom and gloom, but Donald Trump and some government officials throughout the United States are discarding scientific knowledge.  Whether it be fact or theory, we need to trust and accept proficient prognostication and philosophies over political pressure and punditry.

     Americans are frightened.  We are worried about our loved ones.  We are worried about ourselves.  We are scared that if we do get infected, will we die?  As this column is published, Worldometer reports that 74,881 Americans have, in fact, died from COVID-19 while there are 1,264,939 people in the United States who have been diagnosed with the coronavirus infection.  But on Tuesday, May 5th, a story in The Washington Post says "a draft government report" projects that COVID-19 deaths in the U.S. will skyrocket "to more than 3,000 a day by June 1st, with new confirmed cases surging to about 200,000 daily."  However, in that virtual town hall on Sunday, May 3rd, Trump told Fox News that "We're going to lose anywhere from 75, 80 to 100,000 people.  That's a horrible thing.  We shouldn't lose one person out of this." Well, we wouldn't have if Trump had listened to Secretary Azar and Director Navarro in January.  Meanwhile, the global death rate is 265,760 with a total of confirmed cases numbering 3,839,101.  Currently - according to data obtained by Business Insider - there are more Americans dying from complications of the coronavirus than any other cause of death.  It makes me wonder why anyone would avoid the recommendations of doctors and scientists.  Therefore, as I prepare to bring this editorial to a close, I will repeat what I wrote at the outset.  At the beginning of this column I was as clear as a mountain stream when I stated that if you're protesting your governor's stay-at-home and social distancing orders, then you're a fool.  No, not just a fool...you're stupid.

     The "new normal" has become a common phrase of late.  I don't want to hear about the "new normal."  America needs to return to what life was like before the pandemic in order for life to once again be normal in any sense of the word.  None of us should ever accept a "new normal"...because that will never be normal.

     And that's The Controversy for today.

     I'm Gary B. Duglin.

     "We'll talk again."



The Controversy is a publication of GBD Productions.  Founder and Editor-In-Chief of The Controversy is Gary B. Duglin.

Please express your personal opinions by following the instructions printed at the top of this column.  And thank you for reading The Controversy.

Photo credits:

1 - Alex Brandon/The Associated Press (Donald Trump)

2 - Alex Brandon/The Associated Press (Dr. Deborah Birx M.D., White House Coronavirus Response Coordinator)

3 - Alex Brandon/The Associated Press (Kayleigh McEnany, White House Press Secretary)

4 - NBC News/MSNBC Screenshot (Dr. Anthony Fauci M.D., Director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases)

5 - Reuters (Former President Bill Clinton)

6 - Brookings Institution (Dr. Martin Baily, Ph.D., Former Chairman of the Council of Economic Advisers)

7 - AFP (Former President George W. Bush)

8 - Jennifer Stewart/Getty Images (Former Senator John McCain)

9 - George Frey/Getty Images (Senator Mitt Romney)

10 - Nathan Congleton/NBC/NBCU/Photo Bank/Getty Images (Former Vice President Joe Biden)

11 - Michael Svetlov/Getty Images (President of Russia Vladimir Putin)

12 - James Montgomery Flagg, Artist ("Uncle Sam")

13 - Getty Images (Peter Navarro, Director of the National Trade Council)

14 - C-SPAN Screenshot (Secretary of Health and Human Services Alex Azar)

Copyright 2020 Gary B. Duglin and TheControversy.net.  All Rights Reserved.

12 comments:

  1. Quite a lot of self-contradictory opinions contained here...

    In one breath you the Federal government for wanting to try and get the economy back on track, and in the next breath you ridicule them for how bad the economy is. To borrow a phrase, you seem to want to "have all your BLAME, and it eat it too." You want to simultaneously criticize the government (both federal and state) for doing not enough and too little to fix the situation. Sunday quarterbacking at its best.

    The fact of the matter is, state governments rely on tax revenue to fund their budgets - budgets which in turn fund social safety net programs. Without tax revenue from individuals and businesses, these state governments are ultimately going to have to cut vital services that will hurt the very people you are saying they should be responsible for protecting by keeping them at home. There will be far more people affected by lost jobs and incomes than the virus will ever affect.

    There is no doubt that COVID-19 is an extreme medical moment in U.S. history. However, it isn't the first or most extreme in our country's history, nor will it be the last. What is first and unprecedented is the extreme draconian nature to which the government has responded to it. And that, in the end, will prove to be the most damaging result of all to people's lives and livelihoods. Not the virus.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. No contradictions.

      Nowhere in my column do I specify what you are stating in your second of your four paragraphs above. No "Sunday quarterbacking." Why don't you be specific and indicate what you're referring to? None of what you have written makes any sense at all.

      Your third paragraph doesn't respond to my words either. Why don't you be precise and reference my words? Your comments are irrelevant to my column.

      I will respond to your fourth paragraph by saying that by Donald Trump pushing too soon to re-open the country, and by governors - 43 of them - mostly Republican, but some Democrats too, going too quickly by re-opening their states, will cause the coronavirus and COVID-19 to be the "most extreme" health crisis in America's history. Nothing here is "draconian" (to use your word). The coronavirus can potentially kill millions of people in the United States alone, not to mention the millions that it will kill worldwide. Re-opening America too soon is dangerous and will result in more dead bodies. That's not my opinion, that's what the CDC, other health officials, and other doctors and scientists are saying based on fact and scientific hypothesis, which for my money - when it comes to a life-and-death situation, a scientific guess is as good as fact. As I wrote in my column, "All Trump cares about is getting people back to work so our nation's economy can grow, which he thinks will help him get re-elected. But if a person is dead, they can't spend any money." Apparently, there are Americans such as yourself and others throughout the country who think it's more important to worry about the economy of our nation instead of the people's lives. America survived The Great Depression and The Great Recession. We will survive the economic results of the pandemic, but only by electing on November 3rd Joe Biden to be president. We will not - as a country - survive four more years of Donald Trump. And if millions of Americans die from the coronavirus because of Trump's incompetence, negligence, lack of leadership and his deceitful ways, YOU may survive - if you don't die from the disease - but how about all those people who do die, and their families and other loved ones who care for them? People's lives will change forever by the deaths of their mothers and fathers, husbands and wives, sons and daughters, sisters and brothers, and others who they love. And why will they die? Because people like Trump and others like you who seem to care more about saving MONEY, than saving lives.

      GBD

      Delete
    2. You're not thinking critically about anything your saying. Your not actually thinking but just parroting back whatever you read or watch on the news.

      You say, "Apparently, there are Americans such as yourself and others throughout the country who think it's more important to worry about the economy of our nation instead of the people's lives."

      Well Gary, the truth of the matter is that we as a society make decisions every day, both personally and publicly that puts the economy over lives. It's just a matter of degree.

      For example, every time we decide on speed limits for roads, we decide that moving people and commerce at a certain efficiency is worth MORE than the risk of killing tens of thousands of people every year in automobile accidents. According to NSC.org, in 2019 approximately 38,000 people lost their lives in automobile accidents. If you take your argument to it's logical conclusion, namely, that we should care more about lives than the economy, then we as a society would make every personal and policy decision based on the maximum impact to the potential loss of human life.

      However, this is simply NOT what we do. We accept the fact that there is a strong chance and likelihood that lives will be lost when, in using the example above, cars travel down a highway at 75 miles per hour. We accept this fact in exchange for being able to travel faster. If we really ONLY cared about human lives, then the speed limit would be something like 10 miles-per-hour, so that there would be virtually no change of fatal car accidents.

      My point in this one simple example (and there are many more extreme others I could offer) is to say that it is an illusion and a false choice to frame the current argument as a zero-sum choice between "saving lives" and "saving the economy." It is not that simple.

      Delete
    3. The response to the above reader's remarks will be in three parts.

      PART ONE OF THREE

      First of all, I don't "parrot" anybody. I think for myself. I've been a professional journalist, in one form or another, for a very long time (including being an Associated Press award-winning reporter, thank you very much). Everything I write are my own words and my own thoughts, based on my own research.

      However, speaking of "parroting" other people's thoughts, the example you reference, which focuses on speed limits and automobile accidents, has not only been traveling throughout the Internet for quite awhile now, but it's been a political defense by Republicans for many weeks too. Since I don't know who you are - as you have decided to remain anonymous with your remarks - I can't be sure if you're a Republican, an Independent, or a Democrat. I would hope that you're not a Democrat because you're spewing out GOP language.

      U.S. Senator Ron Johnson (Republican of Wisconsin) argued the following in March. "We don't shut down our economy because tens of thousands of people die on the highways. It's a risk we accept so we can move about." Dr. Anthony Fauci, who I'm sure you know is the Director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases says such a comparison is nonsense. "I think that's a false equivalency to compare traffic accidents. I mean, that's totally way out. That's really a false equivalency."

      Then America's "liar-in-chief" made up numbers to defend his position, which is similar to Senator Johnson's. "You look at automobile accidents, which are far greater than any numbers we're talking about. That doesn't mean we're going to tell everybody, 'No more driving of cars.' So we have to do things to get our country open."

      Donald Trump wants to compare "automobile accidents" to coronavirus deaths. Accidents can be simple fender benders all the way to full-blown crashes where the jaws-of-life had to extract people from cars, and where victims ended up dying later. Trump - with his manipulative ways - wants people to think that there are more deaths due to car accidents than deaths from the coronavirus. You'll probably argue that Trump is not thinking that way, but I've studied the man, and that's what his deceitful mind is trying to convey.

      According to the Association for Safe International Road Travel (ASIRT), approximately "38,000 people die every year in crashes on U.S. roadways." As I post these comments, Worldometer reports that 83,425 people have died from the coronavirus in the United States in just about two months. That's more than double the deaths for an entire year from auto accidents nationwide. And the CDC is projecting that by August there will be 147,000 people who will have died in America as a result of being infected by the coronavirus. That means in just about 5 months, the scientific projection is that there will be nearly four times the amount of deaths from coronavirus/COVID-19 than an entire year's worth of deaths due to car crashes.

      GBD

      END OF PART ONE OF THREE

      Delete
    4. PART TWO OF THREE

      You happen to note, but from a different source, that "in 2019, approximately 38,000 people lost their lives in automobile accidents." But your defense makes no sense. What I get from your argument is that by comparing car crashes to coronavirus that you're implying that I should think that with 38,000 annual deaths from traffic accidents that we should not allow people to drive. If you do believe that's what I should be thinking, then you'd be wrong. Each year is approximately the same amount of people killed in auto accidents. But let's just say that one year, there were 100,000 Americans who were killed on our roadways. Or, let's compare apples to apples not apples to oranges since the CDC is projecting 147,000 deaths from coronavirus by August 2020. That's 29,400 a month over five months, or - over a period of one year - 352,800 deaths from the coronavirus IF there is no cure, no vaccine. If in one year, there were 352,800 people killed in automobile accidents - NOT 38,000 - would I then want nobody to be driving in cars? You bet your life I would. I'd take the keys away from everybody. Obviously I'm being somewhat facetious since we are America, "Land of the Free," but even our Founding Fathers would want a way to protect people, and thus there's our Constitution of laws. So the bottom line is that something would need to be done so that more people would not die, and also, so we could find out why there were that many more deaths from car accidents. You mention speed limits, which I will discuss further in Part Three of this response, but we might then see speed limits of no more than 25 miles per hour.

      COVID-19 and the coronavirus is killing American people, and the numbers are climbing everyday. It's a new virus, so it's one that we have not seen before 2020, and people who have died already from the coronavirus would probably still be alive if there was no COVID-19. If something unusual happened that caused 352,800 people in the United States to die in car crashes, there would have to be a reason - a new cause - for those deaths since generally there have been about 38,000 deaths by traffic accidents. Therefore, I would hope that people would be told to stop driving until we found out why so many more people were being killed. You talk about logic? That's logical.

      GBD

      END OF PART TWO OF THREE

      Delete
    5. PART THREE OF THREE

      I disagree with your lack of logic. I don't think anybody "accept(s) the fact that there is a strong chance and likelihood that lives will be lost" by people "travel(ing) down a highway at 75 miles per hour." Nobody gets in to a car and thinks to himself or herself that they might die that day in their car. For me, I'm never in that much of a hurry. Whether I was 17 years old (when I first started driving), or throughour my adult life, I have always obeyed the speed limits, and quite frankly, sometimes go below that limit. It's safer. I've been criticized and mocked for years by family and friends that I don't drive fast enough. But I don't care what others say.

      The phrase "the flow of traffic" is total insanity in my book when it comes to driving faster than the speed limits. But "the flow of traffic" is a phrase that I have heard for years. Here's the deal (to use a phrase often used by the man who I hope will be elected President on November 3rd, Joe Biden) - if you are driving safely by going the speed limit, and all the drivers who are near you are also driving safely, then driving with the flow of traffic is not insanity. But people abuse the "flow of traffic" by carelessly and recklessly driving faster and faster and faster. I was visiting New Jersey last year and was traveling on the Garden State Parkway where the speed limit in certain parts of the highway is at 55 miles per hour. Might I push myself to go 58, or 59, or even 60 miles per hour to pass someone who's in the far right or middle lane and only going 55 or less? Sure I might. But will I go 70 or 80 to pass someone? No. And would I simply get in to the far left passing lane and push the pedal to the metal to go 70 or 80 or even faster for no reason but to drive fast? No way. But I was seeing cars pass me on the GSP that were at speeds of at least 15 to 20 or even 25 miles per hour faster than my car. That's 80 in a 55 zone. Where are the police? Why are cops not pulling people over one car after another when they are breaking speed laws? The answer is "the flow of traffic" But everybody's in a hurry these days. What they don't seem to realize is that they'll end up being in a hurry to die if they don't slow down. Your sarcasm, which insinuates that I would want "the speed limit (to) be something like 10 miles per hour," is ludicrous. But as noted above, 25 miles per hour might be the answer. By having speed limits at 55 miles per hour with people driving 80, or worse than that, speed limits - as they are in Florida, and elsewhere throughout the country - at 75 miles per hour and people driving 85 and 90 or faster, those are people who just may end up killing themselves or others in a crash. And that's what might happen with people who don't stay home, who don't social distance, who don't wear a mask and gloves, who don't wash their hands because of the coronavirus. They very well might die because they're not slowing down. So nobody should "accept (any) fact in exchange for being able to travel faster." And nobody should risk their life in exchange for the country to open up, while there is still the possibility of death by thousands, if not tens of thousands, or perhaps hundreds of thousands more Americans. Dare I say millions.

      So I remain firm on my position that we need to be more concerned about saving lives than saving money. And yes...it IS that simple.

      GBD

      END OF PART THREE OF THREE

      Delete
  2. The following comment was emailed to Gary at The Controversy on May 9, 2020. Since the email was a private correspondence to Gary, the person's name will be anonymous in this forum.

    "Well done, Gary. Your blog on the COVID-19 pandemic is excellent. I echo what you are saying."

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The following comment is in response to the reader's remarks above.

      Thanks very much for your kind words about my column. I do appreciate. GBD

      Delete
  3. The following comment was texted to Gary at The Controversy on May 8, 2020. Since the text message was a private correspondence to Gary, the person's name will be anonymous in this forum.

    "Gary, I like this column. I always agree 100% with what you say. And now the virus is within the White House. What sweet irony if Trump gets the virus!!!"

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The following comment is in response to the reader's remarks above.

      Thank you very much for your kind words about my column. I appreciate that you agree with me 100%. As for Donald Trump becoming infected with the coronavirus, I've always written that I don't wish any harm to Trump. I just want him to be voted out of office on November 3rd and be so humiliated by what I think is going to be a landslide victory by Vice President Joe Biden. So no, I don't hope Trump gets the virus. I want him on January 20th, 2021, just after 12 noon, just after President Biden takes the oath of office, just after our 46th President delivers his inaugural address, I want with huge fanfare for special agents of the FBI - on live television - to put handcuffs on Trump and arrest him for all the crimes he committed and that the Republicans in the U.S. Senate (except for the courageous Senator Mitt Romney) wouldn't recognize in Trump's Senate trial after the Democrats in the U.S. House of Representatives impeached Trump. I want Trump as a civilian to be indicted and to stand trial in criminal court on charges of extortion, obstruction of justice, witness tampering, campaign finance violations, tax fraud, bank fraud and anything else that the Department of Justice and prosecutors can drum up for a judge and jury to examine at such a trial. GBD

      Delete
  4. Gary, your points are valid,truthful and backed by statistics and data.While Biden might not be the best choice anything is better than what we currently have. Once again we are not the United States. Each state might as well be their own country as they do what the .... they want with no regards to each other. A leader leads and listens to his generals around them to make the best decisions. Oh well,not happening here. Stay safe ad make the right decisions by acting and respecting all as this is America.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hello Preville. Thank you for your interesting and well-thought out remarks. I will disagree with you about Vice President Joe Biden. Of the 25 or so Democratic candidates in the 2020 field, I personally chose Mr. Biden from the moment he announced his candidacy in April 2019. In fact, I'm on record for picking the former Vice President immediately after the 2016 election. I noted four years ago that if Hillary Clinton decided to not run in 2020 that I would support Joe Biden because I believe he would (and will) make a great President. That doesn't mean that there aren't others who would also make excellent Presidents (in my view), but of the field that was available for me to select from this time around, I am extremely pleased with Vice President Biden. As I've written in the past - even before he himself said it in interviews and at debates - Joe Biden walks in to The Oval Office on January 20th, 2021 and he knows on Day One what to do as President. There is no "on the job training." Mr. Biden served 8 years as President Barack Obama's PARTNER. Yes. Partner. Much of the success of the Obama Administration is because of Vice President Biden's joint efforts with President Obama. As for your comment that "Each state might as well be their own country," you are correct to a point. But "states' rights" are part of our Founding Father's plan in the U.S. Constitution. And with the out-of-date Electoral College, come November 3rd and election day, we are 51 individual elections. First of all, I support a popular vote not an electoral vote. Get rid of the Electoral College. The reason for the Founders' decision is no longer applicable today. Second, we do have 51 "elections" for President with the 50 states and the District of Columbia. We should have 56 because our 5 territories should have the right to vote for President. Residents of those territories vote in the primaries, but they are not permitted to do so in the general election, and they should. In fact, I support - and have for years been in favor of - statehood for at least Puerto Rico, and perhaps the other territories too. Furthermore, your remark that "A leader leads and listens to his generals around them to make the best decisions" is 100 percent on the mark. You hit the nail on the head. But, of course, Donald Trump listens to nobody but himself or others whose comments are beneficial to Trump, not necessarily beneficial to our country. The man is mentally ill. He's insane. I don't believe one needs to have a degree in medical psychiatry or clinical psychology to make such a statement. Anyone who suggests injecting disinfectants such as Clorox or Lysol in to our bodies has got to be insane. And anyone who takes a drug like hydroxychloroquine when doctors have advised against it, that person has got to be crazy. And so Donald Trump is off the wall. If you haven't already done so, please read my May 19th, 2020 column and I ask and encourage you to please comment after reading that editorial too. I've included a link below, or just click on the title I DOUBT GOD IS HAPPY TODAY in the archives at the top right side of this site. Thank you very much. I truly appreciate your comments and hope to see your name again with other columns that I write in the future. Stay safe and healthy. GBD I Doubt God Is Happy Today (Published Tuesday, May 19, 2020 - 7:11 A.M.)
      http://www.thecontroversy.net/2020/05/i-doubt-god-is-happy-today.html

      Delete